Denmark’s defence of its welfare state is relentless and, according to its critics, even racist. In October, the Ministry of Finance estimated in its annual report on the subject that immigrants from non-Western countries and their descendants withdrew a net 31 billion kroner ($4.9 billion) from public finances in 2018, equivalent to about 1.4% of GDP. Immigrants from Western countries, on the other hand, made a net contribution of 7 billion kroner (see chart). According to Torben Tranaes of the Danish Centre for Social Science Research, it was the data on the fiscal impact of immigration that “changed the view of the social democrats”.
Muslims are at the core of the problem. This year was the first time the ministry produced a separate report on the contributions of people from 24 Muslim countries of origin. They account for 50 per cent of non-Westerners, but 77 per cent of the take. Adding to this concern is the fear that Muslims have ideas about democracy and the role of women that Danes find threatening. Muslims are welcome, says Tesfaye, but “we cannot have double standards. There is not one half of Sharia and one half of the Danish constitution”.
For Muslim listening it sounds like a prejudgement. A law passed in 2018 targeting conservative Muslims forces new citizens to shake hands with a city official at naturalisation ceremonies. Politicians “make you feel like you shouldn’t celebrate Ramadan or Eid or whatever,” says Agob Yacoub, a Syrian refugee. Other groups face no such pressure. Chinese immigrants have not become culturally Danish, but are still “extremely welcomed”, Hedetoft notes. The fact that Muslims are looting the treasury hardly has anything to do with religion, he says. More than half came as asylum seekers or through family reunification, compared to 30 % of other non-Westerners.
“AstraZeneca uncovers what’s triggering blood clots after its jab” reads a recent headline from Mail Online.
“Oh, oh, oh!” one feels like exclaiming. So, it is true, after all. After nearly one year of stonewalling and denials, they officially admit that the Covid vaccines can, in fact, cause blood clots.
This will undoubtedly come as a great shock to those who believe the mainstream media narratives where all talk of vaccine injury has been hitherto dismissed as “misinformation” by those right wing anti-vaxxers.
We have been repeatedly told that only crazy people would believe that the Covid vaccines could be dangerous. After all, scientists and public health officials have always reassured us that these vaccines are “completely safe and effective.”
It turns out, however, that the mantra “completely safe and effective” is not true, since those crack scientists who devised these vaccines now admit that their product can also generate blood clots.
But we should not worry too much about it, because they also helpfully inform us that they may have discovered what in their vaccines causes these deadly side effects:
“They found that the shell of the vector vaccine — the weakened cold virus used to teach cells how to neutralise Covid — sometimes acts like a magnet and attracts platelets, a protein found in the blood. For reasons the scientists are still probing, the body then mistakes these platelets as a threat and produces antibodies to fight them. The combination of the platelets and the antibodies clumping together leads to the formation of dangerous blood clots.” [emphasis added]
Congratulations on that discovery, but it comes a little late in the game after hundreds of millions of doses of AstraZeneca have been injected into people’s bodies world-wide.
To forestall such unpleasant situations from arising, vaccines are normally required to undergo extensive testing, which is a process that usually take several years.
Such bothersome procedures, however, were largely jettisoned when it came to the Covid vaccines, which underwent only a few months’ worth of testing before they were rolled out. Only phase 1 and 2 of the trials could be said to have been completed – and that hastily – before emergency authorization was given to start mass administration. At this time, the public is forced to participate in phase 3 and 4 of the trials and, unsurprisingly, people are suffering all kinds of “unforeseen” side effects.
One only wonders what other deadly side effects we will discover in the months and years ahead.
One thing seems quite certain at this point: these vaccines are not nearly as safe as originally advertised.
Consider the chart below which expresses data in the VAERS database. As you may know, VAERS stands for Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, which is a US government-run facility that collects information about vaccine side effects.
The chart depicts the number of yearly death reports following vaccination for the last thirty years. It shows that the numbers held relatively steady from 1990 until 2020 and were generally under 500 cases per year. This changed dramatically toward the end of 2020 when the Covid vaccines were introduced. At that point, we see a rapid explosion of death reports. So exponential is the increase that the graph line shoots up almost vertically.
It should be a matter of grave concern that in the last 12 months there were more reports of vaccine-related deaths than in the previous 29 years combined.
In light of this, how can anybody in their right mind claim that these vaccines are “perfectly safe”?
In the past, vaccines used to be recalled if a few dozen deaths were shown to have been caused directly by the vaccine.
In the UK alone 73 deaths have already been linked directly to vaccine produced clots. This, however, is a gross understatement of reality as most vaccine deaths are not reported as such and fewer still are properly investigated. The 73 figure only represents the uppermost tip of the iceberg.
The question is why these vaccines are still being mass administered given what we know of the dangers they pose.
Even more astonishingly, why are we vaccinating children given that the risk to healthy children of severe Covid is virtually zero.
A large German study has recently found that in the first 15 months of the pandemic, not one healthy child in the 5-18 demographic died of Covid.
Even before the German study came out, the New York Timesobserved that for children “the danger of severe Covid is so low as to be difficult to quantify.”
Why, then, are we exposing children to the risk of blood clots and other serious conditions – such myocarditis and pericarditis – given that they are at negligible peril of serious Covid?
Vaccinating children becomes even more nonsensical, since we now know that the vaccines do not protect against infection.
What we are doing to our children by injecting them with these unsafe substances is simply unconscionable.
“Yes,” Mabel, “these vaccines are perfectly safe and effective. And they are good for children as well.”
This year’s seasonal flu in Sweden was predicted to be very aggressive, something that has now transpired. In Stockholm, the number of hospital admissions for influenza is twice as high as the number admitted for Covid-19.
The situation is further exacerbated by the fact that many staff members have fallen ill with Covid. Five hospitals in the Stockholm region are so strained that they have gone into crisis mode.
“It’s the beginning of the perfect storm. Right now, the biggest problem is the seasonal flu, we have twice as many hospitalized for it as for Covid,’ explained Sven Klaesson, chief physician at Södersjukhuset, SÖS to Swedish daily Aftonbladet.
Andreas Fischer, specialist doctor and chairman of the Hospital Doctors in Stockholm, said that the basic problem was neither really the flu nor Covid, but the extreme lack of space for which politicians are responsible. Patients are now cared for in any area, and hospitals are actively violating fire protection rules. He said that the large number of hospitalized means that more people will die unnecessarily.
“It is known from studies that such solutions lead to increased mortality and healthcare injuries. Patients who die could have survived if they had received better care. We are in that situation now. Some of the patients we now have who are in the emergency room for 22 hours will die to a greater extent than necessary. I had a patient recently where my assessment was that he could have survived with better care,” said Fischer.
During the past week, the Stockholm Region decided on further cuts of SEK 300 million in the already severely vulnerable healthcare.
“There is someone who does not understand, who is playing monopoly with human life. In order to be able to make decisions that lead to savings in healthcare in the middle of a pandemic, one must have valid reasons. The regional budget should be examined and reviewed.”
He continued: “What is happening now is a disaster. I’m worried about what’s to come with Christmas, New Year’s and the thirteenth day weekend which we know is the worst weekend of the whole year. It is extremely worrying.”
The Europe Trust, a UK-based organization with close ties to the radical Muslim Brotherhood organization, has acquired a €4 million property in the Berlin district of Wedding, an area that is already home to several associations that are being monitored by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV).
The supporters of The Europe Trust, which is regarded as the primary financial vehicle of the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe, are regarded as adherents to so-called “legalistic Islamism” — a strain of political Islam that’s outwardly law-abiding, but aims to establish Islamic states via infiltration of a society’s institutions instead of waging violent jihad to realize its goals, Die Welt reports.
With the help of the Muslim Brotherhood-linked organization’s deep pockets, Wedding — a former Berlin working-class district — has been transformed into a stronghold for political Islam and a hotspot for religious extremists. It is now known as a micro-community filled with mosques, shops, Islamic cultural centers, and associations.
Although the groups and associations operating in the insular community are said to be largely law-abiding, their contempt for Western values is no secret, and their end goal — namely the creation of an Islamic state that’s ruled by the Sharia framework — is no different than of that radical Islamic terrorists.
In light of the recent developments in Wedding and elsewhere in Germany, The Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) is urging politicians to provide their agents with additional instruments that would allow them to take a closer look at the cash flows of these so-called “legalistic Islamic” groups.
“We are only allowed to conduct financial investigations into violent Islamism. The legislature must decide whether our powers should be strengthened in this respect,” said President of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution Thomas Haldenwan to Die Welt.
MP Stephan Thomae, the deputy parliamentary group leader of the liberal Free Democratic Party (FDP), says it is dangerous that legalistic Islamists are trying “in a creeping, inconspicuous manner” to gradually undermine the free democratic basic order.
“Islamism is the breeding ground for extremism and radicalization,” Thomae warned.
Thomas Strobl, a lawmaker for the centrist Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party who serves as the chairman for the conference of interior ministers, agrees with Thomae, saying: “We should make it easier for our security authorities to track down the activities of legalistic Islamist organizations.”
The fears of Strobl and Thomae are also shared by Seyran Ates, a lawyer, feminist, and the founder of Berlin’s liberal Ibn Rushd-Goethe mosque, who believes legalistic Islamism will inevitably exert harmful effects on democracy and an open society.
“Because it is a political ideology that has made Islam its tool. Mafia-like structures have developed under the guise of religion and religious freedom,” Ates said, adding that she is not surprised that large sums of cash are flowing from the UK to establish strongholds in Berlin.
In 2018, the German news magazine FOCUS ONLINE revealed that Germany’s state security service considers the Muslim Brother a greater threat to German democracy than Al Qaeda or the Islamic State.
