Month: October 2021
France: Mosque where terror was being justified closed for 6 months
In the Sarthe region, the state authorities are showing their firmness against the excesses of Muslim religious leaders. According to Ouest-France, on Monday October 25, the prefecture of the department ordered the closure of the mosque of Allonnes, near Le Mans, for six months. Since October 13, the leaders of the AAJM (Association allonnaise pour le juste milieu, editor’s note) and the Al Qalam association, as well as the imams who officiated at the mosque, have been charged with ” justifying terrorism “. The prefecture has since found ” malpractices such as the promotion of a radical practice of Islam ” and the presence of people who ” legitimise armed jihad, martyrdom and the introduction of Sharia law “. The closure was announced this Monday for the 300 worshippers and 110 children of the madrassa. The two associations are also accused of “legitimising terrorist attacks”.
The order issued by the prefecture of the Sarthe department refers to the various abuses committed by these two associations. The document states that in September 2020, after the publication of the Muhammad cartoons by the newspaper Charlie Hebdo, a certain Moulay Driss El Yakoubi gathered young people inside the mosque and said: “These people deserve to die, but we are not in a position of strength”. The state authorities also state in their decree that “this was also the case after the murder of Samuel Paty in October 2020″. The leaders and imams of the mosque rejoiced by calling the perpetrator of the attack on the teacher a martyr. The two associations involved had rejected the ” serious allegations ” on Facebook in mid-October and regretted ” the damage caused to the faithful who attend the mosque and to the Muslim community, which is harmed and stigmatised “.
https://www.valeursactuelles.com/societe/la-mosquee-dallonnes-fermee-six-mois-pour-islam-radical/
Politician warns against Islamisation at German primary schools – The schoolchildren state ” holy warrior” as their career aspiration
The integration policy spokesman of the Hessian Christian Democratic Union (CDU) parliamentary group, Ismail Tipi, has warned against the Islamisation of primary school children. “It is high time when children threaten teachers in primary school, when they draw jihadists in art lessons, when they say they want to be ‘holy warriors’. If we don’t act in time, we will have more problems with a new generation of jihadists in the future than we have today,” the 62-year-old member of the state parliament wrote on Twitter on Monday.
It is very difficult to bring children who have grown up with the “sick ideology of the Salafists” back to the democratic values of the country, he said. “That’s why preventive measures are needed as early as primary schools, also to enable free development on the basis of our democracy and to counteract the emergence of a parallel society.”
In the aftermath of the assassination of the French teacher Samuel Paty on October 16, 2020, pupils in Germany also attracted attention with radical Islamist statements. In Hamburg, after a minute’s silence for the murdered teacher, pupils defended the crime, and in Berlin, an eleven-year-old threatened to cut off his teacher’s head as well.
On October 16, 2020, Samuel Paty, a teacher working in Evreux, France, had been beheaded by an 18-year-old Chechen who had arrived in the country as a refugee between 2007 and 2010, after he had shown Mohammed cartoons in class. The 47-year-old father of a family was the target of hostility from families of Muslim pupils as well as colleagues before his murder.
Swedish politician convicted for citing facts about South Sudanese IQ
Sweden Democratic regional politician Bertil Malmberg was convicted on October 7 in Nyköping District Court for incitement against ethnic groups. Malmberg said at a meeting of the council that South Sudanese have a low average IQ, citing UN figures.
It was at the end of April that Bertil Malmberg at a meeting of Sörmland’s regional council pointed out the research about the average level of intelligence of South Sudanese after the Swedish Migration Agency, in its lack of wisdom, placed a number of South Sudanese quota refugees in Sörmland. This population is among the nations who have the lowest intelligence in the world, which is well documented, according to Malmberg.
Bertil Malmberg was reported to the police by the RFSU-linked Social Democrat Christine Gilljam, who had commented: “The statement expresses racial biological thinking based on the premise that humanity can be divided into different races, where some are more valuable than others.”
When Swedish weekly Nya Tider interviewed Bertil Malmberg in connection with the verdict, he said that he only tried to explain how difficult it has been for these people to integrate in Sweden, and that it would therefore be wiser to help them in their own country.
“There are lots of those who are now brought here as quota refugees, and I do not think that is good. Not only for society but also for the poor people of South Sudan. I have the greatest sympathy for them, they have for decades been employed by the northern part of Sudan which they broke away from in 2011. They have one of the world’s lowest levels of education and widespread illiteracy, the majority have worked as farmers and herders for generations. Placing them in northern Europe is not very wise as I see it,” Malmberg explained.
Malmberg was found guilty on October 7 and he was sentenced to a 40-day fine and a total of 24 000 kronor, for his statement. When Nya Tiderinterviewed Bertil Malmberg after the verdict, he said: “My lawyer and I agree that we will appeal.”
Malmberg explained that he was interrupted and was not allowed to continue during his testimony. “I had intended to refer to the HDI [development index] from the UN and make it clear that it was about these people becoming impossible to integrate into the labor market, but I never got that far.”
The verdict stated that Malmberg wanted to portray the designated ethnic group to “be less valuable than other ethnic groups”. But he pointed out that he had “not spoken at all about any human value – I talked about employability”.
Studies published in peer-reviewed journals (Snyderman and Rothman, American Psychologist, 1987, 1988; Rindermann, Becker and Coyle, Frontiers in Psychology, 2016), showed that intelligence researchers consider genetic differences to be the main cause of differences between different nations’ average IQs , followed by education and health.
Muslim Convert Gets Only 10 Years for Leaving Non-Muslim 5-Year-Old to Die of Thirst
A horrifying story and a typically weak response from the country that has bowed its head to the Jihad.
The wife of an Islamic State fighter was sentenced to 10 years in prison after being found guilty of the murder of a 5-year-old girl.
The 10-year sentence is a joke. And what’s even worse is the horrifying way that the girl was killed.
German-born Jennifer Wenisch, 30, was charged in a Munich court with crimes against humanity after refusing to help a 5-year-old her husband left to die in the scorching heat, the Washington Post reported . Wenisch, a convert to Islam, cooperated with her husband in leaving the girl chained outside, where the enslaved child suffered severe dehydration. The mother was forced to watch her child die from thirst as punishment for wetting the bed.
Wenisch and her husband, Taha al Jumailly, bought the girl and her mother in 2015 while living in the ISIS-controlled city of Fallujah, Iraq.
The Yazidis, who are not Muslim, are considered subhuman.
But I suspect the Kurds would have handled this case more usefully than any European court.
This reminds me of another story involving Germany from the Holocaust.
On a summer day in 1943, Erna Petri took in the rolling hills and meadows on the road back from Lviv, the Ukrainian city where she frequently went shopping. The sun shone bright, allowing her to spot something in the distance. She instructed the coachman to slow the horse-drawn carriage, and, sure enough, she found six children cowering by the side of the road, their tremulous bodies barely covered by scraps of cloth. Petri brought the hungry, scared children back to the white-pillared manor she shared with her husband, Horst, their four-year-old son and infant daughter.
She gathered food from the kitchen, and fed the children as she contemplated what to do next. Horst was not at home. There were no expectations of Erna, as a wife and mother, to act before he returned, but she understood why the children were roaming the countryside. She knew that, just days earlier, their tiny, naked bodies had escaped a crammed Judenwagen headed for the gas chamber.
And so she beckoned them to follow her yet again. This time, she led them away from the house, across the terracotta tiles on the floor of the north portico and vestibule, past the garden and chicken coops and servants’ quarters. When they reached the pit in the woods, Petri ordered the children to turn around and, clutching the pistol her father had given her as a parting gift, she shot them each in the back of the neck, one by one.
Petri would later testify that two of the boys cried, but they were too exhausted to flee. She felt no remorse. In her mind, these children were altogether different from her own, tucked safely inside the house. They were enemies of the state, ones that almost got away.
From an interview with Erna.
Question: How did the children behave as you shot them?
Answer: When I shot the first 2 children, they were in the first moment shocked and immediately began to cry. Then they stopped crying and started instead to whimper/wail. However I did not allow myself to be moved by this and shot the others until they all lay in the gully. None of the children attempted to run away, since, as I could see from their appearance, they had been in transit for several days and were totally exhausted.
Petri was sentenced to life in prison, but was released after less than 30 years in jail, and enjoyed a pretty good life with the help of an SS aid organization. That was commonly the case with Nazi war criminals. And Islamist aid groups will be waiting for Wenisch too.
The unthinkable is very much with us today and Islamofascism is an evil nightmare that is only growing among us.
France: The Muslim woman who took off her headscarf for presidential candidate Eric Zemmour is insulted by Muslims on the web
Strange scene on Monday morning, October 25, in the first edition of “Face à la rue” presented by Jean-Marc Morandini on the CNews channel. The journalist accompanied Éric Zemmour to the residents of Drancy (Seine-Saint-Denis). At the bend in the road, the essayist met a woman called Rachida and a discussion about wearing the veil ensued. Judged by Éric Zemmour as a religious sign, for her it is only “a small piece of cloth that makes her the woman [she is]”.
I decided to wear the veil,” she emphasises. I have only been wearing it for a short time because my heart and my faith led me to this veil,” she adds. Before admitting that she had no intention of taking it off because according to French values “Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité”, women must be respected. She asked the essayist to consider her “as a woman” and not with the garment she was wearing, stating that she was a “free woman”. In response, Éric Zemmour replied, “Take it off if you don’t mind.” Rachida asked him to take off his tie.
The probable future presidential candidate agreed and reminded her that “the tie is not a religious symbol”. His interlocutor’s reply: “Neither is the headscarf, it is faith, what we carry inside. Not so for the essayist, who calls wearing the veil a “commandment of religion”. Rachida finally took off the veil in question and asked him, “Cloth or no cloth, is it not respect that we seek? Is this freedom?” And to assure, “I have decided to take it off.”
After removing the veil, Rachida finally respects secularism, said Éric Zemmour. But this remark did not really please the main actor. “No, I respect myself […] the headscarf does not make the religion. Éric Zemmour took the view that there was “no individual freedom” in Islam and gave her to understand that she was contradicting herself. The video sequence broadcast on social networks has already provoked numerous criticisms from opponents of Éric Zemmour, but also from Muslims, who are visibly annoyed by the scene and in some cases do not hesitate to insult the woman: ” She doesn’t even have a guilty conscience to do that” or “She took off her veil just like that, that crazy woman”. Others questioned her faith: “It is impossible that she is a real veiled woman” or went even further: “I would rather die than take off my veil.
But it is reminiscent of what the essayist elaborated on Sunday October 24 in the RTL show “Grand Jury”. Éric Zemmour had spoken out against the wearing of religious symbols of any kind in public spaces: “I will not be the president of veiled women.”
A French presidential candidate challenges the global oligarchy
Florian Philippot, the leader of the Patriots party in France, targeted “Macron and his clique who have misled the state, even more than their sinister predecessors”. But Philippot does not have the same voter allure as Marine Le Pen or Eric Zemmour.
Philippot’s election programme includes leaving the EU, the European Convention on Human Rights as well as NATO. The President of the Patriots has been leading numerous demonstrations against the health pass since the summer of 2021. He launched his presidential campaign on October 24 by advancing his proposals for a total “rupture” and by vehemently denouncing a “globalist oligarchy” embodied by “Macron and his clique”.
For Philippot, President Emmanuel Macron, “has been waging war on us and since he wants war, he will have war”. His announcement was made in Aubervilliers (Seine-Saint-Denis) in front of his supporters – a little over 1000 people according to AFP, but 1400 according to the organizers.
“France is ruled by an oligarchy which wants its death”, he said as the crowd chanted “Liberty!” and “Macron in prison!”, promising that “blockages will happen, including under the windows of the President of the Republic”.
“This oligarchy, let’s be clear, embraces big finance, big lobbies, especially pharmaceutical. It includes GAFAM [defined as Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, and Microsoft], it includes the European Union and all the supranational structures. To this must be added of course, like a rotten icing on the cake, Macron and his clique who have led the state astray, even more than their sinister predecessors,” he continued.
The former number two of Marine Le Pen had left the FN (now the RN) after the failure of the 2017 presidential election, to launch his own movement Les Patriotes.
Beyond a Frexit and dissolution of the Constitutional Council that Philippot has promised if he is elected in 2022, he would also declare the health pass “illegal” right away and confinement and lockdowns “unconstitutional”.
In terms of health, Philippot has pledged to close the regional health agencies (ARS), suspend France’s participation in the World Health Organization (WHO) and dissolve the state’s Medical Council [conseil de l’ordre des médecins].
At the launch, he explained at length his project not only to exit the European Union (“Frexit”) and an exit from the euro, but an exit from the European Convention on Human Rights and NATO in particular. He also proposed, among other things, to dissolve the Constitutional Council, and to establish a citizens’ initiative referendum.
The Constitutional Council was created by the Constitution of the Fifth Republic on 4 October 1958. It is a court with competence for various matters, including, in particular, the constitutional review of legislation.
The two main rivals are Le Pen and Zemmour
Philippot’s campaign programme differs from that of the National Rally (RN) and Eric Zemmour’s proposals in that it constitutes a clean break from Anglo-American influence. But despite his success in organizing anti-health-pass protests, Philippot does not have the same support as a Marine Le Pen or Zemmour.
Meanwhile, the mayor of Béziers, Robert Ménard, in an interview with BFM TV said Zemmour’s candidacy would certainly be a disaster for conservatives: “We are on course to lose if we continue to be divided.” He added: “We represent nearly a third of voters according to polls, if we have two candidates, we could never qualify for the second round.” He called it ” foolproof stupidity”.
While he has not yet officially declared himself a candidate for the Élysée, Zemmour has witnessed campaign contributions arriving in large numbers at his campaign headquarters according to public broadcaster France 2. Zemmour has been blamed for playing a divisive role to end Marine Le Pen’s bid to become president.
Thus, Zemmour lacks neither ambition nor resources to achieve this. On Wednesday, October 20, the polemicist had not yet officially declared his participation, but according to our colleagues, Eric Zemmour can count on his personal funds thanks to his successful books and donations from individuals who dream of seeing him in the Élysée.
According to the entourage of the former CNEWS star, his war chest is overflowing. He chose a campaign seat in one of the most upscale neighborhoods of the capital, where real estate prices are soaring. Our colleagues from France 2 described the HQ as a building in the 8th district of Paris where, on three levels, the likely candidate and his team hope to settle.
They had at least 300 m2 of offices renovated at great expense. The rental has remained a secret but the former tenant, a famous photography studio, paid 18 000 euros per month, excluding charges, according to the news channel. His wealthy donors evidently see this as a way to damage Le Pen’s chances of becoming France’s leader.
France: Threatening police officers with knives is only punishable by a three-month suspended sentence!
First of all, you have to be an asylum seeker, come from very far away and preferably be a Muslim, especially not a native Frenchman.
On Wednesday morning, a man from Bangladesh came to the French Office for Immigration and Integration (OFII) on Avenue Pierre-Brossolette in Montrouge to ask for accommodation. When he was turned away, he became angry. He returned armed with two knives and attacked the guard (see above tweet). The police were called immediately and the doors were closed to prevent a more serious attack. What happened next was videotaped by a witness, and the video can be viewed on Twitter and elsewhere. When the police arrived, he raised his right hand with the knife and threatened the officers. The three officers then pointed their service weapons and a Taser at him.
“The police officers asked him in vain to drop the knife. The man did not comply with the request. He kept his hand raised so that he could quickly stab anyone who approached. Only by using the taser could he finally be neutralised. He was taken into custody in handcuffs. There were no injuries on the police side.
He was tried in Nanterre and finally sentenced to three months suspended prison for carrying a prohibited category D weapon and acquitted of the charge of threatening the police… Probably because the police only felt threatened.
Long live the Dupond-Moretti justice! That suits him…
Mitrophane Crapoussin
Belgium: Most new hospital admissions were vaccinated against Covid-19
There were 614 new hospital admissions last week and 55 percent of the cases were vaccinated, the Belgian Corona Commissioner Pedro Facon admitted this week at a Sciensano press conference. Sciensano is a research institute and the national public health institute of Belgium.
Facon added that more than three quarters of these Corona patients were older than 65 and the vast majority were older than 75. In the past week, 60 vaccinated people were admitted to the intensive care unit, 70 percent of whom are over 65 years old, according to the Corona officer.
Facon is the first “scientist” to admit the failure of the vaccine campaign. He kicked off the press briefing with another noteworthy warning: “We are not 100 percent protected with the booster shot either.”
He maintained that the jabs were effective against the delta variant however. “They provide about 70 percent protection against infection and about 90 percent against serious illness and/or hospitalization. That’s good, but not 100 percent. And that also does not apply after a booster shot.”
According to Facon, immunity also decreases in people over 65 and in people with reduced immunity (congenital or due to treatment). “If there is a lot of virus circulating in the country, the risk of infection also increases for the vaccinated, because you run a greater chance of coming into contact with an infected person.”
Previously, the alarmist internist and infectiologist Erika Vlieghe had lied on the television program De Afspraak about current hospitalized Covid patients, claiming they were “unvaccinated”. When asked who was currently mainly in the hospital, Vlieghe had replied: “It’s a mixture of different people. Unfortunately, most of the cases are people who have not yet been vaccinated.”
The moderator Bart Schols then asked what percentage of hospitalized cases were vaccinated. “It varies a bit, it depends a bit. It also differs from region to region,” said Vlieghe, trying to avoid the question.
“Is it a quarter or is it 90 percent?” asked Schols. “No, that’s, uh, that’ll be, uh, depending on whether you are, whether it’s just the hospital or the intensive care unit, uh, in, inside the hospital, that’s up to fifty-fifty,” replied the stammering official.
France: Can Éric Zemmour Be the Next President?
The Journalist Who Is Reshuffling the Cards in French Politics
The Financial Times calls him “the extreme right-winger“. For the New York Times he is the “right wing pundit“. For Die Zeit, he is “the man who divides France“… Eric Zemmour, journalist and essayist, is not (yet) an official candidate for the French presidency, but because of his popularity, France is already living at election time.
The presidential elections will take place in about 200 days, but not a week goes by without a poll propelling Éric Zemmour higher and higher in the voter projections for 2022. A Harris Interactive poll published by Challenges magazine on October 6 puts him at 17%, ahead of Marine Le Pen, the candidate of the National Rally party (at 15%, having slipped by 13 points since the summer). Zemmour still remains behind incumbent President Emmanuel Macron, projected at 24%. But for how long?
Seen from abroad, a projected vote tally of 17% for Zemmour may seem low. But in France, the presidential election is a two round competition. The polls quoted here concern the first round only, where there may be 25 candidates in the race. Consequently, first round voting intentions are necessarily fragmented. If the elections were held next week, the only two candidates at the second round would be Marcon and Zemmour.
“Never before have we seen such a meteoric rise in such a short time, insists Jean-Daniel Lévy, deputy director of the poll company Harris Interactive. “We are witnessing the collapse of the very heart of the electorate” of Marine Le Pen.
Who is Eric Zemmour? He is the man who broke through the glass ceiling to insert into the media discussion topics such as “immigration” and “jihad” — which no one had ever dared to talk about publicly. He is a man who embodies the fear of seeing traditional France — the one of church steeples and the “baguette” — disappear under the blows of jihad and political correctness.
A book published by Zemmour on September 16 and entitled La France n’a pas dit son dernier mot (France Has Not Yet Said Her Last Word) is about national identity; 100,000 copies were sold the first week. Zemmour represents the France of yesteryear: the France of Napoleon, Notre Dame de Paris and General Charles de Gaulle, a France that does not want to become an Islamic Republic. “The danger for France is to become a second Lebanon,” Zemmour often says, meaning a country fragmented between sectarian communities that hate and fear one another.
Zemmour is not a professional politician. He started as a political reporter at the daily newspaper Le Figaro in the 1990s, but because he was brilliant and had sweeping judgments about French politicians, and deeply understood political and historical culture, he began to be invited on radio and television. Le Figaro gave him a regular column, and in 2006 he became an authentic television star. His participation for five years on “On n’est pas couché,” (“We Are Not Asleep”), a Saturday night talk show, made him known to all of France. In 2015, the host of the show, Laurent Ruquier, regretted having teamed up with Zemmour. “We didn’t think a monster was going to appear” Ruquier said.
Why is Zemmour “a monster”? Because he claims that “French people from immigrant backgrounds are more controlled than others because most of the traffickers are Black and Arabs…. That is a fact.” Zemmour was convicted in court for saying that, not because it was a lie, but because such an assertion is impossible to prove. French law has refused to use the ethnic statistics as they exist in Great Britain or the United States.
Zemmour appears to be shocking because he states that France ceased to be France the day it allowed parents from foreign origin to give African or Muslim first names to their children (Mohammed is the most prevalent name in the Parisian suburbs). Zemmour says he would like to restore a law from the 19th century that obligated all French citizens “to give French first names” to their children. Zemmour also demands that France cease to be subject to the authority of the judges of the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights. They are the ones, Zemmour says, who prevent foreign criminals from being deported.
He is also uncompromising on societal issues: against assisted reproduction (“I want children to have a father and a mother”), transgender propaganda in schools, same-sex marriage, and LGBT militancy at school. Zemmour is not anti-homosexual, he is just saying that “LGBT lobbies” and “minorities” are at war with France just as Islamists are at war with all Western countries.
Zemmour is popular not because he makes provocative remarks about immigration or LGBT rights. He is popular because he brings to the media concerns that were previously expressed only in the family or among friends. Zemmour’s popularity is growing in the polls today because he is now exporting the debate from the media sphere to the political sphere.
Does Zemmour actually have a chance of becoming president? Zemmour is not yet even an official candidate for the presidential election. He is also the man who saidthat he would “disappoint many people if he did not run”.
For many reasons, yes, Zemmour has a chance to be the next president. First, because Macron has proven that an individual who does not belong to any political party can win. The irregularity is therefore reproducible.
Also, the Constitution of the Fifth Republic in France is entirely built to organize an exceptional personality meeting with the French people. This system was carved out for General de Gaulle and directly voted for by the French people. From that vantage point, the meeting between Zemmour and French people is already a reality. When Zemmour organized the promotion of his latest book, thousands of people rushed to shake his hand.
There are other reasons as well that explain Zemmour’s exceptional popularity. First, the French population nowadays is segmented into different “audiences” or centers of interest. In France, in the political field, the main characteristic of all of these “audiences” is a feeling of “anguish” and “anger” against the elites who promoted mass immigration without consulting the native population. The Confidence Barometer, a poll published every year in France by Cevipof, the research center of the Paris Institute of Political Studies, is a good indicator of the “lassitude, moroseness, distrust” that the majority of the French population apparently feel toward the political class.
Getting out of the current electoral trap
The meteoric rise of Zemmour has had a second effect: he has broken a degrading electoral trap in which the French people are stuck. This electoral trap was thought up in the mid-1980s by France’s socialist President François Mitterrand: dividing the right to prevent them from returning to power. Mitterrand promoted in the state-owned radio and television a microscopic far-right party, the National Front, the first that dared to speak out against immigration.
From the middle of the 80s until now, the media and the left together manufactured an industrial-strength shame machine to stigmatize as “racist” and “Nazi” anyone who dared to raise his voice on issues of immigration.
This policy of shame was so strong that recently even Marine Le Pen, leader of the National Rally (as the National Front is now branded), tried to escape the stigma of being called a “Nazi” by saying positive things about Muslim immigration and not excluding the use of immigration to fill an alleged labor shortage.
With Zemmour, however, the anti-racist media are now working in a vacuum. The more the media try to stigmatize Zemmour as a “Nazi”, the greater his popularity with voters has grown.
Moreover, the leaders of the right-wing party Les Républicains, who did not dare to utter the word “immigration”, are now proposing to “put an end to migration laxity” and to stop “uncontrolled immigration”. Even Macron has privately acknowledged that Zemmour “was right” about immigration.
The Zemmour fight is just beginning. One thing, however, is certain: Zemmour is restoring an authentic democratic debate about topics — security, Islam, immigration — that really matter to the French. For many, Zemmour is the last chance for France not to become an Islamic nation or a “Lebanon in Europe.”
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/17888/france-eric-zemmour