Month: October 2021
Rape in Vienna, Austria: All three Afghans at large again
The crime was well-planned: The two 17-year-old refugees from Afghanistan and their 16-year-old accomplice ambushed the 21-year-old exchange student on her way home from the toilet on the Praterstern in the Leopoldstadt district of Vienna at 1 a.m. on Friday, April 22, 2016. As soon as the girl was in the toilet, a perpetrator opened the lock with a coin. The young woman resisted – the three Afghans knocked her down, the victim’s head was hit against the toilet bowl, her mouth and nose were held shut. The younger perpetrator brutally held the student, his two compatriots raped the student several times.
The three men were soon traced, but at the trial at the end of January 2017, they were meek and camera-shy. The presiding judge clearly stated: “A remorseful confession is not what the defendants made, as they repeatedly relativised their actions when asked about them. And: The multiple commission of the crime, the extremely brutal procedure, the fact that three perpetrators were facing a victim, who was even more in a particularly defenceless state in the toilet, were aggravating factors. The judge added: “I can’t imagine whether they will get a right of residence after their imprisonment”.
The judge imposed prison sentences: two times six years for the two 17-year-old Afghans, once five years for the offender who was one year younger. The three rapists should therefore be in prison until next year.
But the three Afghans are no longer in custody, they are free, they are probably still living among us – the three rapists are somewhere in Vienna or in a big German city. “Yes, the three boys have all been released from custody early,” confirmed lawyer Dr Martin Mahrer in an interview with eXXpress.
This is “not at all unusual, but actually normal in the penal system”, the lawyer explains: after serving 2/3 of the prison sentence, release is foreseen – so the Afghan sex criminals were released from their cells after only three and four years. With the conviction in January 2017 and the months of pre-trial detention taken into account, even the two main perpetrators may have been released at the beginning of this year.
The victim will no longer have to fear meeting these three Afghans again: The student is back in Turkey, lawyer Sonja Aziz tells eXXpress: “The requirement that the three perpetrators pay the young woman 24,310 euros in compensation for pain and suffering was not met.” Not a single cent had been paid, the sum is considered irrecoverable, the three perpetrators will probably get away without paying.
The eXXpress was unable to research where the three Afghans now live: The names are kept secret – so it is uncertain whether the trio might have been flown to Afghanistan before the Taliban took over the government.
However, the chances of deportation would have been extremely poor: In four years (May 217 to May 2021), only 1316 forced departures of Afghans took place – i.e. an average of 329 persons per year. 44,000 Afghans are currently in Austria.
https://exxpress.at/vergewaltigung-am-praterstern-alle-drei-afghanen-wieder-in-freiheit/
The Left and the Control of Meaning
By S.R. Piccoli
So YouTube is banning all content they say is spreading misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine. “Working closely with health authorities, we looked to balance our commitment to an open platform with the need to remove egregious harmful content,” the video-sharing platform said in a September 29 statementposted to its blog. “We’ve steadily seen false claims about the coronavirus vaccines spill over into misinformation about vaccines in general, and we’re now at a point where it’s more important than ever to expand the work we started with COVID-19 to other vaccines.” In response, YouTube taking action in censoring anti-vaccine content has been immediately celebrated by liberal journalists and members of the media. “Finally! good grief,” Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin wrote. “This is good news, but it’s a little too late,” Salt LakeTribune correspondent Bryan Schott reacted.
This is just one of the latest examples of censorship that are taking place throughout the U.S. Whether it is anti-vaccine content or politically incorrect discourse, free speech is under heavy attack in America. Take the case of philosopher and pedagogist Peter Boghossian, a Portland State University professor who recently resigned from his position in a searing open letter in which he accused the administration of fostering an environment hostile to intellectual inquiry and dissent. “Students at Portland State are not being taught to think. Rather, they are being trained to mimic the moral certainty of ideologues,” he wrote. “Faculty and administrators have abdicated the university’s truth-seeking mission and instead drive intolerance of divergent beliefs and opinions. This has created a culture of offense where students are now afraid to speak openly and honestly.” You might say he’s reinventing the wheel — well, right, but Boghossian is a liberal, a liberal who points the finger at the illiberal university. In his resignation letter, he claimed that when he tried to speak out against harmful “illiberalism,” he faced intense reprisal. “The more I spoke out about these issues, the more retaliation I faced,” he wrote. Is it a sign that enough is enough?
It can also be said that the above two cases are emblematic of the huge influence of cultural Marxism on American society. But how did we get to this point? As Michael Knowles makes clear in his recent book Speechless: Controlling Words, Controlling Minds, the academic world, which has been thoroughly corrupted by political correctness, demands intellectual conformity. “In the second decade of the 21st century,” he writes, “politically correct reformers undermined the old standards by appealing to ‘free speech’ and inveighing against ‘censorship,’ but no sooner had the radicals cracked the old moral order than they began to enforce a new standard of speech with all the force and rigidity they once claimed to oppose.” As we have seen, political correctness reached its apotheosis during the early weeks of 2021, “when corporate enforcers of the new standards took the liberty of censoring a duly elected president of the United States.” How did conservatives react to the attack? They mustered two responses, says Knowles, both of which have only accelerated the progress of the radicals’ campaign: “The most conciliatory conservatives have simply gone along, ceding one piece of the culture after another to political correctness. Their more curmudgeonly brethren have refused to abide by political correctness but nonetheless have effectively tolerated it on broadly liberal grounds.” What is worse, according to Michael Knowles, is that conservatives failed to thwart political correctness “because they mistake it for a campaign of ‘censorship’ against ‘free speech’ rather than a contest between two competing standards of speech and behavior.” In other words, the cleverness of political correctness is that it aims less to erect new standards than to destroy the old ones: “Political correctness may be understood in this way to be a sort of ‘anti-standard standard,’ which succeeds just as surely by persuading people to abandon standards altogether — for instance, in the name of ‘free speech absolutism’ — as it does by impelling acquiescence to its ever-changing dictates.”
Meanwhile, in just a few decades the United States has become an increasingly secular nation in which unsettling phenomena such as the sudden rise of transgenderism and the war on Christmas are meant to transform common sense into prejudice and traditional notions of morality into systems of oppression. But if the left has won the culture war, says Knowles, it’s because they won the game of semantics. As a matter of fact, while conservatives look at words as a means to express and hear ideas, leftists see them as instrumentum regni. That’s precisely the idea behind political correctness, which “contorts language in an attempt to remake reality along leftist lines.” Diligent disciples of postmodern philosophers of the Frankfurt school and Italian Marxist theoretician Antonio Gramsci, who laid the foundation for the left’s slow takeover of the culture, leftists successfully infiltrated schools, religion, art, entertainment, the family, and, what is more, the language. Knowles’s subtitle, after all, speaks volumes: controlling words means controlling minds. What college campuses have become — centers for leftist indoctrination — is proof that there is a semantic context in which the game’s already lost before it starts, regardless of one’s personal feelings and beliefs. It was the leftists who won the game of semantics, and therefore, says Knowles, it is they who can set the terms and premises of any debate, especially those within elites and other important segments of public opinion and decision-making segments, and thereby win every time. If this isn’t a fight to the death, I don’t know what it is.
France will close six mosques due to spread of radical Islam
France has announced that it is about to close six mosques and dissolve several associations suspected of spreading and promoting radical Islam. According to RTL television, French Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin made the announcement on Wednesday.
Darmanin told Le Figaro that since November 2020, authorities had identified one-third of 89 religious sites or entities as being “suspected of spreading extremism.”
They have already taken steps to close six mosques across five districts.
Authorities will also demand the dissolution of the Islamist publishing house Nawa, which, according to Darmanin, incites the extermination of Jews and legitimizes the stoning of homosexuals, as well as the League for the Defense of Black Africans (LDNA), which advocates for hatred and discrimination.
He added that another 10 associations will be dissolved over the next year, four of them next month.
https://rmx.news/france/france-will-close-six-mosques-due-to-spread-of-radical-islam/
Australian mining magnate outs NSW premier as Big Pharma lobbyist
Australian mining magnate and politician Clive Palmer has called out the disgraced Gladys Berejiklian – who was forced to resign as New South Wales premier – as one of the recipients of tens of millions of dollars from Big Pharma to lobby for shots.
On 1 October 2021 Berejiklian announced her intended resignation both as premier and member of the Liberal Party following the commencement of an Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) investigation to determine whether a “breach of public trust” had occurred.
Palmer has meanwhile called on employers and heads of government to stop coercive practices forcing people to be vaccinated or lose their jobs. “Thousands of distressed Australians are contacting the United Australia Party because they have been told ‘no jab, no job’ by their employer,” Palmer said.
“These coercive measures are causing untold levels of anxiety, stress and financial hardship to innocent Australians. “Many are public servants. They feel they have no voice and nowhere to turn. I want to assure all Australians that our party is here to listen and make a difference. “We will fight to protect the values that have been built and developed in Australia since federation,” he added.
“It is undemocratic and wrong to deny any Australian their constitutional rights and freedoms because they choose not to take part in a vaccination program for personal or medical reasons.
“The data is clear. The virus doesn’t discriminate between those vaccinated and those not vaccinated. So-called ‘fully vaccinated’ people can still be infected and can also pass the virus on to others,” he said.
Palmer, who leads the United Australia Party, said that vaccination, therefore, had no impact on the ability of an individual to perform their workplace duties. “Hundreds of people are contacting UAP every day as they feel they have nowhere else to turn. Nobody is helping them or even hearing them. “It’s time employers and governments stopped to think about the havoc and distress they are causing in people’s lives.”
For a population of 25,6 million, Australia bought the following vaccination doses:
126.5 million Pfizer
25 million Moderna
53.8 million AstraZeneca
Plus 51 million Novovax, if approved.
That means that there are some 256 million vaccine doses for 25,6 million people or 10 vaccinations per person.
France: Chechen Teen Allegedly Stabbed by Brother for ‘Living European’, Raped by Father
Chechen Teen Allegedly Stabbed by Brother for ‘Living European’, Raped by Father
Gepostet von Breitbart London am Samstag, 2. Oktober 2021
Meghan Markle’s USA Popularity DISASTER Revealed
Gay Parking Spaces 🤣 You Won’t Believe This 🤣
Pfizer Lobbyists Claim Responsibility For Installing Politicians Into Positions of Power
A serious question: when someone helps install a politician into a position of power, and then becomes a lobbyist, are any “favours” then expected of said politician?
This specifically addresses 2 of them. One is Erin O’Toole, Leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, and Leader of the Official Opposition. The other is Doug Ford, Leader of the Ontario Progressive Conservative Party, and Premier of Ontario.
Both men are in their respective positions as a result of others who then went on to become lobbyists for Pfizer. Both support the mass vaccination agenda, and support lockdowns and martial law of society.
Last month, 4 lobbyists from Pfizer tried to push for vaccine sales on behalf of their client. This is according to records from the Ontario Lobbying Registry. Let’s take a look into who these people actually are.
Why Are Americans Being Coerced To Submit To Injection With A Dangerous Substance That Is Known Not To Protect Against Covid but to cause death and serious health injuries?
Why Are Americans Being Coerced To Submit To Injection With A Dangerous Substance That Is Known Not To Protect Against Covid but to cause death and serious health injuries?
Paul Craig Roberts
The Israelis Have Now Admitted the Impotence of the “vaccine” on TV news:
If the “Covid Pandemic” is real, why have Denmark, Norway, and Sweden abolished all Covid restrictions and declared an end to the crisis?
What explains the Vaccine Mandates? It is known that the vaccine does not protect—thus masks and booster shots—but it does kill and maim. Why are they determined to kill and maim us?
Three Thousand Doctors and Scientists want to know why they are being prevented from treating their patients with safe and effective medicines.
Over 3,000 Doctors and Scientists Sign Declaration Accusing COVID Policy-Makers of ‘Crimes Against Humanity’
The answer seems to be profit for Big Pharma and authoritarian control for government.
On ABC with George Stehanapoulos Pfizer CEO Albert Boula said henceforth normal life consists of annual booster shots. https://www.infowars.com/posts/pfizer-ceo-says-normal-life-wont-return-without-regular-covid-vaccinations/
Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel agrees. He says there will be Covid booster shots forever.
The gravy train is forever.
And so are the injuries and deaths from the vaccine.
45% of the FDA’s Annual Budget Comes from Big Pharma
The regulators are financially dependent on those they are supposed to regulate. Economist George Stigler pointed out decades ago that regulatory agencies are always captured by the industry they regulate. Regulators become facilitators and agents for the regulated.
Some New Yorkers Belatedly Wake Up and Protest Vaccination Mandate by Democrat Governor Who Has No Authority to Issue Mandates
Health Care Workers Who Have Witnessed Deaths and Disabilities from Vaccine Refuse The Death Shot
That should tell you something. Why do people take the Death Shot when health care workers have to be coerced into taking it?