Month: October 2021

The dispute between Warsaw and Brussels over Poland’s judicial reform is escalating. The Polish Constitutional Court ruled that elements of EU law violate the country’s constitution. This could allow Poland to disregard the judgments of the ECJ.

“The attempt by the European Court of Justice to interfere in the Polish judicial system violates (…) the rule of primacy of the constitution and the rule that sovereignty is preserved in the process of European integration,” the judges ruled on Thursday.

Specifically, the procedure was aimed at discerning whether provisions from the EU treaties, with which the EU Commission justifies its right to have a say in questions of the rule of law, are compatible with the Polish constitution.

Among other things, the Brussels authority has doubts about the independence of the Polish Constitutional Court, which has now determined that national law takes precedence over EU law. The chair is Julia Przylebska, a close confidante of PiS boss Jaroslaw Kaczynski.

“The EU institutions act outside the limits of the competence that Poland gives them,” said Przylebska when pronouncing the verdict.

The EU Commission expressed its “concern” about the ruling. Brussels will use “all means” to ensure that EU law is respected in Poland, said EU Justice Commissioner Didier Reynders on Thursday. The principle that EU law takes precedence over national law and the binding character of decisions by the EU judiciary are central to the confederation of states, he said.

Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki had asked the Polish Constitutional Court to review a judgment of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) of March 2, 2021. In this ruling, the top EU judges found that EU law can force member states to disregard individual provisions in national law, even if it is constitutional law.

Because of the reforms, the EU Commission has already opened several infringement proceedings against the government in Warsaw and has filed lawsuits with the European Court of Justice (ECJ).

Poland’s government had actually relied on a German constitutional court ruling. In May 2020, the Karlsruhe judges objected to the European Central Bank’s bond purchases worth billions – and thus opposed an ECJ ruling for the first time.

The Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe, Germany, reserved the right to carry out the final inspection.

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/10/08/polish-constitutional-court-declares-eu-law-incompatible/

https://www.fdesouche.com/2021/10/07/sur-la-mecque-par-allah-jvais-me-faire-virer-rayanne-b-accompagne-dun-livreur-amazon-qui-avoue-voler-et-revendre-des-colis/

On Saturday, Polish conservative writer and journalist Rafał Ziemkiewicz was detained by British services at Heathrow International Airport. Ziemkiewicz had landed in the UK while accompanying his daughter who was to start studies at Oxford University. Authorities permitted entry to Ziemkiewicz’s wife and daughter.

After a few hours of investigation, the publicist was detained without a stated reason. Ziemkiewicz was stripped of his medicine, documents and mobile phone. Later, the British Home Office issued a Notice of Refusal of Permission to Enter which declared that Ziemkiewicz had been refused permission to enter the UK due to his political views.

“I consider your exclusion from the United Kingdom is conductive to the public good. This is due to your conduct and views which are at odds with British values and likely to cause offence and therefore make it undesirable for you to be granted entry,” the document reads.

“The migration officer told me to voluntarily rebook my flight because due to my personal political views I will not be permitted entry to the UK. I, of course, responded that such a thing was out of the question. I also asked why did they mind my political views but did not receive an answer,” Ziemkiewicz recounted the situation.

The publicist was deported from the UK and forced to fly back to Poland on Saturday evening.

“I will be investigating this matter but not concerning the fact that I was not let in, but because someone has slandered me by spreading lies about me that I am, for example, a Holocaust denier,” he said. Ziemkiewicz explained that the issue most likely concerned a sentence from his book “Cham niezbuntowany” which was taken out of context.

“This is only one example out of many which are shared and spread across multi-lingual Jewish websites such as Jewish.pl,” he explained.

“This has all led to the situation in which I was rejected from the UK by some English person who doesn’t understand a word of Polish and I’ve been written into some secret list of fascists,” he stated.

Do Rzeczy weekly Editor-in-Chief Paweł Lisicki called the situation absurd and Orwellian in an interview for media portal Salon24.pl

“We are dealing with pure Orwell. Following this line of thought, each person which the government does not like may be considered ‘detrimental to public good.’ Another absurd thing in this case is the fact that Rafał Ziemkiewicz was travelling to London completely privately. No meetings, conferences or debates were scheduled by him,” Lisicki said.

He added that referring to “public good” in Ziemkiewicz’s case emphasized the Orwellian character of the problem.

“This shows that Great Britain is no longer Great Britain but increasingly more like Soviet Britain,” he declared.

https://rmx.news/article/banned-from-britain-influential-polish-conservative-writer-and-journalist-refused-entry-to-uk-due-to-personal-views/

Pfizer scientists have described their own pharmaceutical company as “evil”. On hidden camera footage released by Project Veritas, the employees of the pharmaceutical giant admitted that natural immunity rather than the vaccine was more effective against SARS-CoV-2.

One employee even stated that “our organization is run on Covid money now”. Nick Karl, a scientist directly involved in the production of Pfizer’s pandemic injection, admitted that natural immunity was more effective than the product which Pfizer produces.

“When somebody is naturally immune – like they got Covid – they probably have more antibodies against the virus… When you actually get the virus, you’re going to start producing antibodies against multiple pieces of the virus… So, your antibodies are probably better at that point than the [Covid] vaccination.”

According to Nick Karl, New York City was only requiring vaccine mandate cards in order to “[make] it so inconvenient for unvaccinated people to the point where they’re just like, ‘f*ck it, I’ll get it.’ You know?”

A second Pfizer employee, Senior Associate Scientist, Chris Croce, corroborated Karl’s statement that natural immunity was better than getting the shot.

The Veritas journalist asked Croce: “So, I am well-protected [with antibodies]?” The scientist responded: “Yeah.” Actually, he underlined that people with natural immunity were “probably more” protected.

“How so? Like, how much more?” the journalist demanded to know.

“You’re protected most likely for longer since there was a natural response,” said Croce. He also expressed dismay at his company’s lack of ethics adding that the monoclonal antibody treatments had been “pushed to the side” because of greed and money. Croce said this was “disgusting”.

“I still feel like I work for an evil corporation because it comes down to profits in the end. I mean, I’m there to help people, not to make millions and millions of dollars. So, I mean, that’s the moral dilemma.”

He added: “Basically, our organization is run on Covid money now.”

The third Pfizer scientist, Rahul Khandke, admitted that his company demanded that its employees keep this vital information from the unsuspecting public. “We’re bred and taught to be like, ‘vaccine is safer than actually getting Covid.’ Honestly, we had to do so many seminars on this. You have no idea. Like, we have to sit there for hours and hours and listen to like — be like, ‘you cannot talk about this in public,’” Khandke explained.

Khandke also conceded that proof of antibodies was as good as proof of vaccination. “If you have [Covid] antibodies built up, you should be able to prove that you have those built up,” he said.

With >80% of the vulnerable population vaccinated and if the vaccine is so effective at preventing hospitalization and death, how do we explain what happened in August & September? pic.twitter.com/DQL19GMYeR

— PLC (@Humble_Analysis) October 7, 2021

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/10/07/pfizer-vaccine-scientist-calls-his-company-evil/

A man of Turkish origin was sentenced today in Braunau to two years’ unconditional imprisonment for aggravated coercion. The Austrian citizen threatened to kill his wife if she refused to wear a headscarf.

The 37-year-old man, who is already serving a five-year prison sentence for aggravated assault, is alleged to have made dangerous threats against his wife during their daily telephone conversations.

“If you don’t wear a headscarf from now on, I will break all your bones, kill you and cut your head off your body. I don’t care if I get 20 years for it,” the accused said. Instead of apologising, however, the man indirectly blamed his wife, dismissing the threat as a harmless quarrel. “I scolded her, she scolded me. I am ashamed that I am here as an accused because of my wife. It was a normal marital quarrel.” As to why she should wear a headscarf, he explained, “I told my wife to wear the headscarf until I am out of prison. People have heard so many things, so I told her that.”

That he was alluding to the protection Muslim women wearing headscarves have from harassment by Muslim men, as they are recognisable as believers, was confirmed by his wife a little later during questioning. The motive was jealousy: “My husband is not religious, for him the headscarf means that no one looks at me and that I am honourable,” the petite witness testified, adding: “I now have a new mobile phone number because I am afraid. She said she did not feel safe despite the fact that her husband was in “I know him, he has had me threatened and followed by his friends. He has said he will get an ankle bracelet and then he will teach me,” she said.

Judge Stefan Kiesl sentenced the defendant to two years’ unconditional imprisonment. “Rarely has a decision been so easy for me. I believe every word your wife says and have not the slightest doubt that her statements are one hundred percent true,” said the judge. Commenting on the defendant’s behaviour, Kiesl said, “It doesn’t get more reprehensible than this. After getting five years imprisonment for an incredibly aggressive act, you try to manipulate people while you are in prison. The two years’ imprisonment must also be seen as a general preventive measure. The clear message must go out that in our society such attitudes are not tolerable.”

The Turk had already been convicted of a knife attack in 2019. Because of debts, he stabbed a man with a 20cm folding knife in a betting shop in Braunau. He was sentenced to 5 years in prison at the time.

https://exxpress.at/zwei-jahre-haft-fuer-drohung-wenn-du-kein-kopftuch-traegst-brech-ich-dir-alle-knochen/

.

Citing serious cardiac problems, including myocarditis and pericarditis, the Swedish Public Health Agency announced on Wednesday that it was recommending use of the Moderna vaccine be discontinued in young people born after 1991.  Denmark as well as Finland issued a similar ban for people aged 12-17 in the same week.

“The Swedish Public Health Agency has decided to suspend the use of Moderna’s vaccine Spikevax, for everyone born in 1991 and later, for precautionary reasons,” the Agency declared on Wednesday. “The cause is signals of an increased risk of side effects such as inflammation of the heart muscle or heart sac.”

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned about the risk of developing heart inflammation from the Moderna and Pfizer jabs in June this year. Myocarditis is a condition that causes the swelling of the heart muscle and can cause difficulty breathing, heart failure, and death.

“New preliminary [analysis] from Swedish and Nordic data sources indicate that the connection is especially clear when it comes to Moderna’s vaccine Spikevax, especially after the second dose,” the statement noted. “The increase in risk is seen within four weeks after the vaccination, mainly within the first two weeks.”

The agency concluded that they had “decided to recommend a break for all use of Spikevax for people born in 1991 and later. […] The decision is valid until 1 December 2021. The Swedish Public Health Agency will return with a notice of recommendation after this date.”

On the same day, the Danish Health Authority issued a similar warning: “In the preliminary data … there is a suspicion of an increased risk of heart inflammation, when vaccinated with Moderna,” even if “heart inflammation is an extremely rare side effect that often has a mild course and goes away on its own”.

In April, Denmark permanently banned AstraZeneca jabs after it was determined that the injections caused deadly blood clots.

Finland is the third Scandinavian country to impose new restrictions on the Moderna shot. On Thursday, the government announced that the injection will be banned for younger males due to the risk of rare but harmful side effects, including heart inflammation.

The director of Finland’s health institute said men born in 1991 or later will be vaccinated with Pfizer instead. Mika Salminen, the director of Finland’s health institute, explained that the new restrictions were based on data collected in a Nordic study.

“A Nordic study involving Finland, Sweden, Norway and Denmark found that men under the age of 30 who received Moderna Spikevax had a slightly higher risk than others of developing myocarditis,” He said the Nordic study would be published within the next coming weeks.

Preliminary data was also made available to the EU medicines regulator, the EMA, for further assessment. In July the EMA had warned that heart inflammation had been detected in younger male jab recipients.

Despite this, Italy’s Health Minister Roberto Speranza told reporters on Thursday that his country would not suspend the use of Moderna, urging European countries to “work together more closely to coordinate better”.

In July this year, a study published in JAMA’s Cardiology Journal, revealed that 23 male soldiers (including 22 who were deemed “previously healthy”) between the ages of 20 and 51 presented “acute onset of marked chest pain” within four days of receiving their second jab. Several US soldiers treated in the military health-care system following the injection were subsequently diagnosed with clinical myocarditis.

Sadly, they were all “physically fit by military standards and lacking any known history of cardiac disease, significant cardiac risk factors, or exposure to cardiotoxic agents” before their vaccine injuries.

These diagnosed cases had all submitted to full electrocardiographic and echocardiography tests. Abnormal electrocardiography findings were recorded in 19 patients (83 percent).

The cardiac symptoms faded within a week of onset for some, but at least a third of them continued to have chest discomfort.

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/10/07/breaking-sweden-denmark-finland-ban-moderna-citing-risk-of-myocarditis/