French historian wants to replace the term Judeo-Christian culture with “Islamo-Christianity”

I had the dubious distinction of attending Charles Saint-Prot’s lectures on two occasions, with a fairly large time gap between the two events. The absurd thesis of his work is that Islam is on the whole a harmless religion. And if there are some persistent upsets, this should not be taken too seriously. On the other hand, his unconditional support for Sadam Hussein and the Iraqi regime has led him to hate his Syrian Baathist rival Bashar al-Assad. And this hatred, for which there is no serious basis, has led him to support those who want to overthrow his regime. This is logical. It can be verified here.

And for that he claims many untrue facts, not only about Syria. Mr de Saint-Prost is a very bad liar. Not everyone is good at lying. Not everyone is François Mitterrand or Jacques Chirac.

At a recent conference, he rejected the notion of Judeo-Christian culture. Why not? Christianity and Judaism have indeed evolved and distanced themselves significantly from each other over the last two thousand years, with Christianity gaining its independence from its mother religion, which in turn distanced itself from the original Judaism via the Talmud.

But one should propose Islamo-Christianity as a term instead! For Mr Saint-Prot, these are two sister religions with only a few differences. And to reiterate that Islam has no particular animosity towards Christianity. It is true that Islam seems to bear a greater grudge against the Jews. But that does not prevent the fate of Christians in the Orient from being dismaying. And also very revealing.

In any case, Islam does not tolerate anything that is strange to it, especially in the religious sphere. Wherever it settles, it tries to erase every trace of another civilisation, another culture (the destruction of the Buddhas in Afghanistan remains the culmination of this way of thinking). Endless expansion is Islam’s way of life. It still astonishes me that some people do not realise this. Islam is imperialistic, and this is its necessary mode of survival. Without the threat of the death penalty for apostasy, i.e. for genuine religious freedom, almost no one would be Muslim anymore.

Referring back to Charles Saint-Prot, he is now proposing an economic alliance with the Maghreb countries, especially Morocco, because he is convinced that that is where France’s future lies. In fact, he wants above all to flee the EU (which is understandable) and takes refuge in the fantasy of a return to a modern French North Africa (FNA). Dreams and fantasies, but nothing real.

The desire to exonerate Islam prevents any clear analysis. Islam is an evil with many harmful faces. It is a big mistake to ignore it.

Plato du Vercors

https://ripostelaique.com/le-naufrage-de-charles-saint-prot-apologiste-de-lislam.html